Driver chipset intel x38 express

It has been quite some time since Intel launched a desktop chipset targeted squarely at power users and PC enthusiasts. Of course, the P and current P35 have both been very well received by motherboard manufactures and the enthusiast community, but these chipsets were actually designed for the upper-mainstream space.

In fact, the X Express, which launched almost two years ago, was the last desktop chipset Intel specifically marketed for enthusiasts. The X38 takes all of the things that have made the P35 a success and adds a slew of new features designed to increase memory and graphics subsystem performance. DDR3 speeds up to MHz are officially supported, but through overclocking much higher speeds are possible.

Intel actually claims the X38 is capable of DDR3 speed of roughly 2. In retrospect, I felt I bought my new system a bit too soon, I should have waited until about now to make the jump. Good article.

If you exclude PCI-E 2. My take on the differences in voltage offerings just said to me that the P5E3 is your board if you prefer memory overclocking, and the DQ6 is the preferred CPU overclocking board. Wanna bet Nordic Hardware creates some Frankenstein of the two? Some people also make a game out of minimizing the system power draw, just like some people like to tweak an extra 0.

Wimpy hardware will work with old games and low rez. However when I purchase new hardware i could care less about how much wattage it consumes. I only care about not having to read the system requirements on a game box and how much noise it makes. I never understood the wattage thing. I never understood it. The Asus name is P5E3, yes? Just typo or what? Even dual gigabit NICs need more bandwidth than this. There are plenty of cards out there that require x4.

Tech Report has been giving a lot of love to folks with tiny monitors lately, but I suspect that the extremely low resolution was chosen for testing so that the graphics card fill rate would not limit performance, but some CPU or memory bottlenecks might become apparent. I got my info from some Intel rep.

He said it had something to do with the way the memory pathways were setup? Surprisingly enough, the vast majority of the market still plays on that resolution. The only reason that PCIe 2. It has very little to do with bandwidth reasons. PCIe 1. The catch is that GPU-guys are already getting darn close to the practical thermal and power limits of silicon.

The laws of diminishing returns are also creeping up as well. A No one runs games at that resolution any more. It would have been useful to know what that bottleneck was. The limitation to x1 PCIe lanes on the southbridge sucks. The southbridge is limited to PCIe 1. Few of your tests seem to max out the bus: 6 disks, Raid-5 in conjunction with high-speed ethernet could be interesting.

A soild chipset that started out in very expensive boards. They were rendered obsolete by socket and VRM changes by the time boards became affordable. I doubt PCIe 2. There is no reason for extra bandwidth outside of high-end RAID cards. If I get poor marks I will cut my TR visits by I would have liked to have seen more comparison of memory performance for DDR vs.

DDR vs. Of course Dissonance, I just want you to know that this article is taking precedence over my studying.

If I get poor marks…. Type search above and then hit Enter. All tests were run three times, and their results were averaged. Processor Core 2 Duo E 2. Worldbench WorldBench uses scripting to step through a series of tasks in common Windows applications. Gaming 3DMark06 scores are predictably consistent between the chipsets, but can the latest and greatest games show a performance advantage for either of these platforms?

CPU utilization is low across the board. The Nvidia chipset attains quicker access times, though. Power consumption We measured system power consumption, sans monitor and speakers, at the wall outlet using a Watts Up Pro power meter.

Overclocking For our overclocking tests, we dropped our CPU multiplier to 6X—its lowest possible value. Comments closed. Krogoth 14 years ago It would be interesting to review such equipment. Just remember that 10Gbit Ethernet is practically useless outside of servers and backboning.

Bensam 14 years ago Good article. Gungir 14 years ago My take on the differences in voltage offerings just said to me that the P5E3 is your board if you prefer memory overclocking, and the DQ6 is the preferred CPU overclocking board. Forge 14 years ago The Asus name is P5E3, yes?

Krogoth 14 years ago Nehalem is going to on a completely different LGA socket. Krogoth 14 years ago Surprisingly enough, the vast majority of the market still plays on that resolution. Krogoth 14 years ago I guess you were never burnt or annoyed by AGP 1x, 2x, 4x and 8x non-sense eh? MasterRanger 14 years ago Great mobo reviews as usual. Thanks for your great reviews! Anomymous Gerbil 14 years ago Haha, very droll! Intro, Conclusion, Comments sometimes.

Krogoth 14 years ago Oh, I forget to mention that X38 is literately the next X. Usacomp2k3 14 years ago Reading it, I was given cause to wonder if firewire works right in Vista. Sargent Duck 14 years ago Same here. Post first, then read article. I guess I should read the article now. Follow Us Today! Contact Privacy Guest Post About. Pin It on Pinterest. X38 Express. P35 Express. Front-side bus. Memory controller.

PCI Express lanes. Multi-GPU support. Chipset interconnect. Peak interconnect bandwidth. Serial ATA ports. Peak SATA data rate. Native Command Queuing. RAID 5. Matrix RAID. ATA channels. Max audio channels. Audio standard. USB ports. Price Street.

Price MSRP. Bus speeds. Please do not enter contact information. If you require a response, contact support. Skip To Main Content. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox. Support Navigation Support. Support Home Technologies. Close Window.